H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Ivan Lendl H2H: 1-0
Thomas Enqvist holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Lendl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1993 Schenectady quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1993* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Ivan Lendl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Ivan Lendl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 |