H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 0-1

Jaime Oncins holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Oncins leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1993 Memphis round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jaime Oncins
BRA Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Oncins #44 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #70 Match data Feb 11, 1993* R32 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Jaime Oncins #1,034 #34 773 1,810 64 87 42.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jaime Oncins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1988 1–2 33.3% #314 1,493 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1989 0–2 0.0% #263 1,470 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1990 0–4 0.0% #113 1,442 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1991 22–17 56.4% #64 1,677 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1992 27–19 58.7% #48 1,778 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1993 11–23 32.4% #133 1,584 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1994 1–7 12.5% #230 1,505 0 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1995 1–2 33.3% #222 1,508 0 2
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1996 0–2 0.0% #160 1,491 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 1997 0–6 0.0% #166 1,439 0 2
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 1998 1–2 33.3% #223 1,451 0 2
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 — — — — — — —
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2001 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,438 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jaime Oncins
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 7 15 22 31.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 32 42 74 43.2% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 125/142 of Jaime Oncins's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jaime Oncins
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1991 35/39 3.2 2.6 55.4% 69.9% 50.1% 49.9% 43.4% 61.0% 41.7%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1992 42/46 3.0 3.8 55.5% 69.7% 45.7% 54.9% 43.5% 59.3% 42.8%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1993 29/34 2.9 4.4 58.2% 66.6% 40.7% 51.5% 42.1% 55.8% 40.6%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1994 6/8 2.2 9.0 57.5% 65.4% 40.9% 63.4% 41.9% 55.0% 39.7%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1995 3/3 3.0 5.3 60.8% 70.0% 43.9% 63.0% 24.5% 59.4% 39.6%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1996 2/2 1.5 18.5 45.0% 69.3% 28.9% 47.3% 28.6% 47.0% 43.5%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 1997 6/6 3.0 9.7 51.8% 67.9% 35.1% 48.8% 61.9% 52.0% 35.0%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 1998 1/3 4.0 8.0 57.7% 66.7% 31.8% 33.3% 33.3% 51.9% 35.1%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2001 1/1 3.0 13.0 56.5% 63.9% 46.8% 60.0% 50.0% 56.5% 39.3%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 125/151 3.0 4.5 56.0% 68.7% 44.6% 52.8% 43.3% 58.1% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jaime Oncins
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1988 1493 95.3 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.86 0–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.30
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1989 1471 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1990 1442 102.8 — — — — +19 — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — -0.15
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1991 1677 121.5 +0.13 +1.64 1.068 51.1% -83 -50 -66 55.6% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.89
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1992 1778 131.6 -1.02 +2.52 1.052 50.9% -123 +21 — 58.1% +0.28 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.08
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1993 1584 130.7 -3.35 +1.16 0.920 48.2% +18 +63 — 39.3% -0.56 5–11 (31%) 2–9 (18%) — -0.21
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1994 1506 104.0 -2.79 -0.18 0.883 47.5% +74 +44 — 36.4% -0.86 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.29
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1995 1509 108.4 +0.94 -0.26 0.977 49.5% — +44 — 33.3% -0.50 — — — -0.02
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 1996 1491 108.9 +1.07 +2.59 0.821 45.2% — — — 28.6% -2.14 0–1 1–1 — -0.08
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 1997 1439 112.1 -3.40 -1.77 0.729 43.8% +88 +85 — 13.3% -1.93 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 1998 1451 107.4 -1.60 -1.30 0.730 43.1% +85 — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–1 — -0.07
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2001 1438 100.2 +0.01 -0.73 0.903 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1810 127.5 -1.35 +1.50 0.987 49.6% -49 +28 -66 47.0% -0.28 17–39 (30%) 23–23 (50%) 90.4 +1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.