H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Jaime Yzaga H2H: 3-2

Thomas Enqvist holds a 3–2 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1996 Auckland fourth round 7-5 6-4.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 12, 1996* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Jaime Yzaga #108 7-5 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data
Mar 18, 1995* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jaime Yzaga #40 6-2 7-6(5) Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data
Feb 23, 1995* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #43 2-6 7-6(6) 7-5 Jaime Yzaga #37 Match data
Jul 30, 1994* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #49 2-6 6-3 6-4 Jaime Yzaga #25 Match data
Jul 22, 1994* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #60 6-1 6-1 Jaime Yzaga #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,870 238 205 53.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jaime Yzaga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,604 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,843 0 3
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,766 0 4
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1992 25–18 58.1% #49 1,687 0 6
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,779 0 8
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,726 0 8
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,613 0 8
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,608 0 8
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19