H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Jared Palmer H2H: 1-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 1–0 lead over Jared Palmer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1994 Memphis round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jared Palmer
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #58 6-3 6-2 Jared Palmer #98 Match data Feb 10, 1994* R32 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Jared Palmer #1,385 #35 908 1,793 69 80 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jared Palmer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 1988 1–2 33.3% #517 1,510 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1989 3–2 60.0% #240 1,575 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1990 1–2 33.3% #564 1,567 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1991 1–3 25.0% #427 1,521 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1992 2–4 33.3% #149 1,536 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1993 9–14 39.1% #105 1,605 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1994 28–20 58.3% #36 1,790 0 1
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1995 17–20 45.9% #125 1,717 0 1
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1996 4–7 36.4% #214 1,651 0 1
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 — — — — — — —
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1998 0–3 0.0% #174 1,598 0 1
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 1999 1–1 50.0% #435 1,611 0 1
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2000 2–2 50.0% #357 1,621 0 1
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 — — — — — — —
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jared Palmer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1995 10 10 20 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1998 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 37 43 80 46.2% 19 18 37 51.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 6 8 14 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jared Palmer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 1988 1511 103.7 — — — — — — — 36.4% -0.45 1–1 — — +0.08
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 1989 1575 120.0 — — — — +29 — — 61.5% +0.23 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.46
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1990 1568 102.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.10
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1991 1522 96.9 — — — — — — — 36.4% -1.09 0–1 1–1 — +0.70
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1992 1537 116.7 — — — — +37 — — 44.4% -0.44 0–2 — — +0.01
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1993 1606 122.8 — — — — -14 -61 -33 47.5% -0.26 0–8 (0%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.34
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1994 1790 143.7 — — — — -57 -106 — 55.1% +0.46 8–7 (53%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.51
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1995 1717 129.7 — — — — -40 -20 -96 47.1% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.01
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1996 1652 119.0 — — — — — -27 +6 44.1% -0.03 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.12
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 1998 1598 96.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — +0.19
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 1999 1612 106.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 0–1 — -0.30
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2000 1621 116.8 — — — — +49 — — 50.0% +0.70 1–1 0–1 — -0.46
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1794 135.2 — — — — -28 -66 -49 48.1% -0.12 19–31 (38%) 35–37 (49%) 97.4 -0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.