H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-1

Thomas Enqvist holds a 2–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1997 Basel fourth round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 1997* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #15 7-5 7-5 Jeff Tarango #55 Match data
Aug 14, 1995 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #13 7-5 6-1 Jeff Tarango #62 Match data
Mar 13, 1993* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Jeff Tarango #71 2-6 6-2 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2