H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Jim Courier H2H: 2-6

Jim Courier holds a 6–2 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 5–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2000 Miami Masters second round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 22, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Enqvist #7 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Jim Courier #60 Match data
Nov 6, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Jim Courier #39 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Jul 27, 1997* Los Angeles ATP 250 F Hard Jim Courier #29 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #8 Match data
Nov 14, 1995 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Thomas Enqvist #8 6-3 6-2 Jim Courier #7 Match data
Apr 15, 1995* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 QF Hard Jim Courier #15 7-6(4) 6-0 Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data
Jan 7, 1995* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Jim Courier #13 6-2 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #59 Match data
Jul 31, 1994* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Jim Courier #12 6-2 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #49 Match data
Jan 17, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jim Courier #2 2-6 6-3 6-1 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #190 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jim Courier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19