H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 2-2

Thomas Enqvist and Jonathan Stark are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1996 New Delhi semifinal 7-6(6) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Jonathan Stark
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #9 7-6(6) 7-5 Jonathan Stark #140 Match data Apr 13, 1996* SF New Delhi World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #53 7-6(2) 6-3 Jonathan Stark #71 Match data Jan 12, 1995* R32 ASB Classic ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jonathan Stark #57 3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #53 Match data Oct 14, 1993* R32 Bolzano ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jonathan Stark #61 6-4 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #67 Match data Jun 17, 1993* R32 Halle Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Jonathan Stark #829 #36 913 1,802 135 150 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jonathan Stark
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #403 1,482 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1990 0–1 0.0% #1007 1,476 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1991 1–3 25.0% #243 1,466 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1992 19–19 50.0% #85 1,632 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1993 28–23 54.9% #38 1,760 0 1
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1994 26–23 53.1% #65 1,701 0 1
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1995 18–24 42.9% #100 1,635 0 1
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1996 19–16 54.3% #68 1,729 0 2
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1997 17–23 42.5% #96 1,645 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 1998 4–11 26.7% #266 1,576 0 2
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 1999 3–4 42.9% #300 1,587 0 2
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2000 0–1 0.0% #512 1,575 0 2
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2001 0–1 0.0% #809 1,556 0 2
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jonathan Stark
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1993 16 15 31 51.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1994 19 15 34 55.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 10 15 25 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 5 1 6 83.3%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1997 12 16 28 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 84 101 185 45.4% 7 12 19 36.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 23 15 38 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 247/283 of Jonathan Stark's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jonathan Stark
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1991 2/4 9.5 4.5 55.3% 87.0% 61.2% 50.0% 43.8% 75.3% 38.3%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1992 32/38 7.8 3.4 57.8% 73.9% 51.2% 63.5% 43.7% 64.0% 35.2%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1993 43/51 7.9 4.1 59.6% 75.4% 51.9% 58.3% 41.6% 66.0% 37.0%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1994 44/49 8.4 3.4 59.4% 75.5% 53.5% 66.5% 42.5% 66.6% 34.6%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1995 36/42 8.4 3.6 59.8% 74.9% 48.1% 57.2% 31.2% 63.9% 34.0%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1996 33/35 9.8 2.7 61.8% 77.5% 50.3% 61.8% 48.9% 67.3% 36.6%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1997 40/40 12.0 4.4 58.1% 77.9% 47.2% 52.9% 35.1% 65.2% 36.1%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 1998 10/15 9.7 3.9 57.8% 73.2% 42.6% 53.3% 50.2% 60.5% 31.6%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 1999 5/7 7.8 5.6 56.3% 75.0% 54.9% 57.9% 37.3% 66.2% 34.1%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2000 1/1 3.0 4.0 57.4% 67.7% 47.8% 25.0% 0.0% 59.3% 27.6%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2001 1/1 11.0 5.0 58.7% 88.6% 54.8% 66.7% 20.0% 74.7% 24.7%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 247/285 9.0 3.7 59.2% 75.9% 50.3% 59.5% 40.5% 65.5% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Jonathan Stark
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 1988 1483 96.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1990 1477 103.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.08
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1991 1467 107.7 +1.68 +0.55 1.551 55.2% — — — 33.3% -0.44 0–1 — — +0.20
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1992 1632 131.9 +1.77 -1.58 0.977 49.8% +6 -134 +30 51.6% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — +1.18
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1993 1761 148.8 +4.38 -0.55 1.088 51.2% +9 -195 -98 56.3% +0.48 5–9 (36%) 12–13 (48%) — -2.43
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1994 1701 136.5 +4.00 -2.92 1.035 50.6% +27 — -76 51.3% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 16–9 (64%) — +1.67
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1995 1636 139.5 +1.82 -2.24 0.944 49.1% +35 -83 -8 41.0% -0.33 7–6 (54%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.07
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1996 1730 141.3 +3.90 -0.61 1.121 51.8% +1 — -41 55.1% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) — -0.71
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 1997 1645 132.9 +2.38 -1.22 1.039 50.5% +18 -89 +39 45.8% -0.21 7–11 (39%) 16–13 (55%) — +0.04
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 1998 1577 115.9 +0.36 -2.34 0.799 46.3% +3 — — 33.3% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 1999 1588 117.9 +0.64 -0.69 1.011 49.8% +12 — +49 44.4% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.10
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2000 1575 100.2 -0.93 +0.34 0.677 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2001 1557 100.1 -1.00 -0.03 0.974 49.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.20
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1802 142.5 +2.91 -1.53 1.024 50.3% +16 -133 -17 48.7% +0.02 35–54 (39%) 70–68 (51%) 97.2 -0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.