H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Leander Paes H2H: 0-1
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics fourth round 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1996* | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | R16 | Hard | Leander Paes | 7-5 7-6(3) | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 424 | 283 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,737 | 53 | 77 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 18 | 2000 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 19 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,712 | 0 | 19 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #72 | 1,623 | 0 | 19 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,588 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |