H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 1-6

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 6–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 5–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2002 Stockholm third round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 24, 2002* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 (w/o) Thomas Enqvist #37 Match data
Mar 17, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #22 Match data
Sep 6, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #9 6-3 6-2 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #5 Match data
Aug 14, 2000 Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #9 6-3 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #6 Match data
May 13, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #12 7-6(6) 2-6 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Jan 9, 2000* Adelaide ATP 250 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #25 3-6 6-3 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #4 Match data
Jan 10, 1999* Adelaide ATP 250 F Hard Thomas Enqvist #22 4-6 6-1 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30