H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 3-5

Magnus Larsson holds a 5–3 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 4–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1999 Long Island third round 4-6 7-6(3) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 26, 1999* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #20 4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 Magnus Larsson #82 Match data
Aug 16, 1999 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Magnus Larsson #92 7-6(6) 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #19 Match data
Nov 7, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Magnus Larsson #26 6-1 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data
Oct 10, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Magnus Larsson #26 7-5 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #16 Match data
Jan 2, 1997* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Magnus Larsson #46 6-4 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Feb 16, 1996* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #7 6-3 6-2 Magnus Larsson #21 Match data
Jan 22, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Magnus Larsson #18 (w/o) Thomas Enqvist #44 Match data
Jan 15, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Thomas Enqvist #190 7-5 7-6(6) 7-5 Magnus Larsson #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Magnus Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7