H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Marc Rosset H2H: 5-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–3 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marc Rosset leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2001 Indian Wells Open round of 64 7-6(0) 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #9 7-6(0) 2-6 6-4 Marc Rosset #61 Match data Mar 14, 2001* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Marc Rosset #72 7-5 1-6 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #12 Match data Feb 26, 2000* SF London ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #13 6-1 6-3 Marc Rosset #26 Match data Feb 25, 1999* R32 London ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Thomas Enqvist #21 6-3 6-4 6-4 Marc Rosset #31 Match data Jan 29, 1999* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Thomas Enqvist #21 6-2 6-3 Marc Rosset #28 Match data May 1, 1998* R16 Munich Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #16 6-4 4-0 (ret.) Marc Rosset #23 Match data Oct 9, 1997* R32 Vienna Open Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Marc Rosset #20 6-2 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #51 Match data Oct 1, 1993* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marc Rosset #35 6-4 1-6 7-6(2) Thomas Enqvist #347 Match data Oct 4, 1991* R16 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 0 3 0 2 14 19
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,956 406 335 54.8% 0 1 0 0 2 12 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Marc Rosset
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,812 0 2
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,649 0 2
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1992 37–22 62.7% #35 1,879 0 4
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,942 0 7
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,931 0 9
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 11
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1996 33–28 54.1% #22 1,784 0 11
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 12
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,745 0 12
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 13
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,733 0 15
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,603 0 15
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,598 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,587 0 15
33 — — — — — — — 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,547 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Marc Rosset
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 1 6 7 14.3% 22 11 33 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 19 5 24 79.2%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1994 21 14 35 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 11 9 20 55.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 8 10 20.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 13 13 26 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 16 12 28 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 154 134 288 53.5% 112 102 214 52.3% 26 31 57 45.6% 114 68 182 62.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 592/673 of Marc Rosset's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Marc Rosset
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1991 45/46 7.8 3.6 54.9% 77.0% 46.8% 53.3% 32.5% 63.3% 36.3%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1992 48/59 8.9 3.8 57.4% 77.3% 50.4% 57.4% 42.5% 66.0% 36.5%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1993 62/67 9.9 3.6 58.7% 79.4% 50.7% 65.4% 39.9% 67.5% 38.7%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1994 66/73 10.0 5.1 57.1% 79.2% 48.8% 64.6% 40.2% 66.3% 38.4%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1995 50/59 9.3 4.8 55.3% 79.3% 50.6% 63.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.1%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1996 48/61 10.9 4.6 58.8% 80.6% 48.5% 63.0% 45.0% 67.5% 35.7%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1997 54/63 7.7 5.8 55.4% 76.0% 45.8% 57.7% 38.9% 62.7% 37.2%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 1998 48/54 9.6 6.4 54.6% 79.0% 46.3% 50.1% 31.9% 64.3% 35.9%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 1999 47/53 9.9 6.9 53.7% 79.4% 46.8% 63.0% 41.5% 64.5% 36.4%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2000 49/56 10.0 6.2 57.6% 77.0% 47.8% 55.6% 39.3% 64.3% 36.5%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2001 30/35 9.4 7.5 56.2% 74.8% 42.5% 60.1% 40.5% 60.7% 32.0%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2002 18/20 13.6 7.3 57.8% 78.0% 49.5% 63.8% 40.4% 66.0% 32.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 15/15 10.3 7.7 56.3% 76.6% 46.2% 64.8% 45.0% 63.4% 33.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 12/12 9.2 4.6 58.6% 76.7% 45.3% 51.6% 37.4% 64.2% 31.7%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 592/741 9.6 5.3 56.5% 78.2% 48.0% 59.9% 39.6% 65.1% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Marc Rosset
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 1988 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.04
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1989 1614 132.6 — — — — — +46 — 73.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.48
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1990 1812 141.5 — — — — -150 -4 -202 54.4% +0.13 18–6 (75%) 17–7 (71%) — +0.66
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1991 1649 138.9 +2.30 -1.77 0.989 49.4% +23 +47 — 45.5% -0.40 3–12 (20%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.07
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1992 1880 156.4 +3.97 -0.48 1.074 51.0% -52 -9 -248 59.7% +0.63 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.83
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1993 1942 153.8 +5.65 +0.59 1.191 52.8% +30 -111 — 65.8% +0.89 13–7 (65%) 16–12 (57%) — -0.51
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1994 1931 148.4 +4.31 +0.54 1.138 51.9% +40 -202 -306 59.7% +0.31 13–10 (57%) 26–12 (68%) — -0.29
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1995 1815 145.3 +3.76 -0.37 1.111 51.7% +19 +11 -111 60.8% +0.67 10–7 (59%) 18–15 (55%) — +1.03
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1996 1784 147.2 +4.82 -1.13 1.097 51.5% +4 +62 -40 55.5% +0.36 12–13 (48%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.64
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 1997 1631 133.6 +1.06 -0.88 0.997 49.8% +7 +208 +88 51.3% +0.01 12–8 (60%) 14–15 (48%) — +1.44
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 1998 1745 145.3 +1.96 -0.58 1.005 49.5% +36 -39 -45 50.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.59
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 1999 1658 138.7 +2.15 -0.73 1.026 50.4% +83 -45 -24 49.6% +0.20 8–8 (50%) 8–15 (35%) — +1.75
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2000 1733 140.8 +2.25 -0.56 1.023 50.0% +41 -77 -59 57.2% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.28
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2001 1604 126.4 -1.32 -4.04 0.816 46.8% +95 -7 -35 33.7% -0.93 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.48
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2002 1599 127.6 +2.47 -3.30 0.951 49.2% +56 +4 -18 46.9% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.72
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1587 123.1 +1.30 -1.92 0.911 48.7% +50 — -17 40.0% -0.77 0–1 7–3 (70%) — -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1548 116.7 +0.60 -3.15 0.886 47.7% +75 +9 — 40.7% -0.67 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.43
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1956 148.8 +2.94 -0.82 1.042 50.5% +22 +2 -83 54.3% +0.21 129–108 (54%) 183–150 (55%) 105.7 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.