H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Marc Rosset H2H: 5-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–3 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marc Rosset leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2001 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(0) 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Enqvist #9 7-6(0) 2-6 6-4 Marc Rosset #61 Match data
Feb 26, 2000* London ATP 250 SF Hard Marc Rosset #72 7-5 1-6 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #12 Match data
Feb 25, 1999* London ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #13 6-1 6-3 Marc Rosset #26 Match data
Jan 29, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Thomas Enqvist #21 6-3 6-4 6-4 Marc Rosset #31 Match data
May 1, 1998* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Enqvist #21 6-2 6-3 Marc Rosset #28 Match data
Oct 9, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #16 6-4 4-0 (ret.) Marc Rosset #23 Match data
Oct 1, 1993* Basel ATP 250 R16 Hard Marc Rosset #20 6-2 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #51 Match data
Oct 4, 1991* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Marc Rosset #35 6-4 1-6 7-6(2) Thomas Enqvist #347 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,950 398 334 54.4% 0 0 0 0 14 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Marc Rosset
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,811 0 2
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,648 0 2
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1992 31–22 58.5% #35 1,826 0 3
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,922 0 6
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,925 0 8
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 10
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1996 31–27 53.4% #22 1,771 0 10
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 11
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,749 0 11
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 12
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,723 0 14
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,601 0 14
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,597 0 14
32 — — — — — — — 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,586 0 14
33 — — — — — — — 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,546 0 14