H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Mark Petchey H2H: 1-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1996 New Delhi round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Mark Petchey
GBR Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #9 6-4 6-4 Mark Petchey #204 Match data Apr 11, 1996* R32 New Delhi World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Mark Petchey #1,313 #80 552 1,597 34 64 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Mark Petchey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #954 1,489 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #382 1,467 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1989 1–2 33.3% #307 1,466 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1990 1–3 25.0% #240 1,450 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1991 1–3 25.0% #255 1,462 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1992 1–2 33.3% #245 1,473 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1993 1–3 25.0% #121 1,473 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1994 15–22 40.5% #120 1,518 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1995 7–15 31.8% #149 1,464 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1996 5–7 41.7% #212 1,514 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1997 2–3 40.0% #159 1,551 0 0
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 1998 0–2 0.0% #587 1,529 0 0
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 — — — — — — —
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 — — — — — — —
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Mark Petchey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1994 6 13 19 31.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 3 10 13 23.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 10 30 40 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 16 23 39 41.0% 4 6 10 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 76/89 of Mark Petchey's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Mark Petchey
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1991 4/4 2.3 8.0 54.7% 63.8% 44.8% 50.5% 34.3% 55.5% 34.1%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1992 3/3 4.7 4.0 56.6% 72.0% 42.0% 65.4% 46.9% 59.2% 32.5%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1993 3/4 6.7 3.3 65.2% 66.1% 54.7% 75.0% 36.1% 62.2% 34.2%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1994 34/37 5.3 5.1 56.3% 69.7% 49.8% 54.3% 38.0% 60.9% 35.2%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1995 18/22 4.1 4.9 59.8% 67.4% 46.0% 52.2% 40.2% 58.5% 36.5%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1996 9/12 3.9 5.7 55.9% 69.6% 48.8% 59.9% 61.4% 60.3% 38.7%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1997 4/5 4.5 5.8 55.7% 68.5% 35.5% 55.3% 35.2% 54.0% 30.0%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 1998 1/2 8.0 9.0 65.5% 72.4% 25.0% 50.0% 50.0% 56.0% 37.6%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 76/98 4.7 5.2 57.5% 68.7% 47.3% 55.5% 41.4% 59.5% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Mark Petchey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 1987 1490 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.07
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 1988 1468 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — +0.19
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1989 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.45 — 0–2 — +0.47
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1990 1451 100.8 — — — — — — — 27.3% -1.09 1–0 0–2 — +0.29
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1991 1462 105.5 -2.68 -2.85 0.767 44.8% — — +68 30.8% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.02
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1992 1473 99.7 -2.99 +0.05 0.796 46.6% — — — 33.3% -0.78 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.16
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1993 1474 104.1 -2.28 -0.48 0.904 48.5% — — +65 38.5% -0.23 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.15
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1994 1519 125.7 -0.42 -2.04 0.901 48.4% -41 +31 +106 45.1% -0.42 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.45
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1995 1465 114.6 -2.77 -1.82 0.879 47.6% -26 +126 +138 37.5% -0.91 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — +1.43
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1996 1515 112.8 -0.94 +1.11 0.974 49.6% -54 — +124 46.7% -0.27 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.52
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 1997 1551 107.3 -1.91 -0.62 0.653 42.9% — — +133 46.2% -0.31 — 1–0 — -0.04
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 1998 1529 97.9 +2.40 +2.82 0.856 47.1% — — — 16.7% -2.00 — — — -0.11
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1598 117.7 -1.37 -1.37 0.877 47.8% -37 +72 +110 39.5% -0.68 8–20 (29%) 10–22 (31%) 87.6 +4.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.