H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 2-3

Mark Philippoussis holds a 3–2 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2003 Miami Masters third round 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-3.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2003* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mark Philippoussis #70 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #87 Match data
Jun 28, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Mark Philippoussis #104 7-5 6-3 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #26 Match data
Mar 19, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #10 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(8) Mark Philippoussis #35 Match data
Jan 27, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #21 6-2 6-4 6-7(3) 4-6 6-2 Mark Philippoussis #16 Match data
Feb 21, 1998* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Philippoussis #16 3-6 6-2 7-6(3) Thomas Enqvist #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Mark Philippoussis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19