H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 4-4

Thomas Enqvist and Mark Woodforde are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1999 Los Angeles third round 6-3 6-4.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 29, 1999* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #18 6-3 6-4 Mark Woodforde #78 Match data
Jan 7, 1999* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #22 0-6 6-4 6-4 Mark Woodforde #58 Match data
Jun 13, 1998* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Mark Woodforde #66 6-3 1-6 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #17 Match data
Apr 20, 1996* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Woodforde #24 6-4 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #8 Match data
Jan 26, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Mark Woodforde #67 6-4 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data
Mar 8, 1995* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Enqvist #23 6-3 6-4 Mark Woodforde #32 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #34 6-3 7-6(4) Mark Woodforde #39 Match data
Jan 14, 1993* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Woodforde #40 4-6 6-1 6-1 Thomas Enqvist #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4