H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-1

Thomas Enqvist and Martin Damm Sr are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on clay, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 128 6-1 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #13 6-1 6-3 7-5 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jun 27, 2001* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Martin Damm Sr 7-5 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #70 Match data Apr 29, 1993* R32 Munich Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Thomas Enqvist Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 — — — — — — —
1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 — — — — — — —
1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 — — — — — — —
1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 — — — — — — —
1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 — — — — — — —
1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 — — — — — — —
2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 — — — — — — —
2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 — — — — — — —
2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 — — — — — — —
2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 — — — — — — —
2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 — — — — — — —
2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Thomas Enqvist Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Thomas Enqvist Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 106.2 -0.26 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) 96.7 -0.87 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) 105.3 +0.15 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) 111.4 -0.31 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) 98.5 +2.31 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 93.3 +0.31 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) 103.2 -1.78 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) 98.0 -1.56 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) 101.6 -0.24 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 98.6 +0.65 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) 103.1 +0.01 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) 91.2 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) 90.3 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.8 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.