H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2005 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Enqvist #97 6-4 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10