H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 2-1

Thomas Enqvist holds a 2–1 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1999 Bournemouth third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nicklas Kulti
SWE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 16, 1999* Bournemouth ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Enqvist #17 7-5 6-1 Nicklas Kulti #101 Match data
Oct 24, 1998* Ostrava ATP 250 QF Carpet Thomas Enqvist #18 6-3 6-4 Nicklas Kulti #472 Match data
Apr 16, 1992* Nice ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicklas Kulti #100 6-2 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #171 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Nicklas Kulti #977 #32 826 1,819 150 179 45.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Nicklas Kulti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1988 3–4 42.9% #176 1,543 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1989 7–9 43.8% #118 1,581 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1990 15–11 57.7% #51 1,745 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1991 18–24 42.9% #80 1,656 0 1
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1992 18–23 43.9% #79 1,611 0 1
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1993 27–24 52.9% #46 1,690 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1994 20–26 43.5% #99 1,675 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1995 6–8 42.9% #165 1,638 0 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1996 14–16 46.7% #64 1,636 0 3
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1997 9–17 34.6% #154 1,578 0 3
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1998 3–3 50.0% #290 1,602 0 3
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1999 10–9 52.6% #118 1,632 0 3
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2000 0–5 0.0% #421 1,558 0 3
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 — — — — — — —
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 — — — — — — —