H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 2-2
Thomas Enqvist and Nicolas Lapentti are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2004 Miami Masters first round 7-5 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2004* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2000* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | (w/o) | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1999* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | QF | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-3 6-2 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Jan 31, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-3 7-5 6-1 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |