H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 2-5

Patrick Rafter holds a 5–2 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Patrick Rafter leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2001 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-1 6-3 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Patrick Rafter
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 6, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Patrick Rafter #10 6-1 6-3 7-6(5) Thomas Enqvist #13 Match data
Jun 27, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Patrick Rafter #2 7-6(5) 6-2 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data
Jan 24, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #21 6-4 4-6 6-4 6-4 Patrick Rafter #4 Match data
Oct 23, 1997* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Patrick Rafter #3 (w/o) Thomas Enqvist #16 Match data
Aug 23, 1997* Long Island ATP 250 SF Hard Patrick Rafter #14 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #11 Match data
Aug 8, 1996* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #12 6-3 7-6(4) Patrick Rafter #68 Match data
Jul 21, 1995* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Patrick Rafter #64 6-2 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,104 332 177 65.2% 2 2 0 0 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Patrick Rafter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,619 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,803 0 1
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,777 0 1
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,761 0 1
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,035 1 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,010 2 8
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,933 2 9
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2000 30–16 65.2% #15 1,889 2 10
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,989 2 11
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 — — — — — — —
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 — — — — — — —