H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 4-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 4–3 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1998 Ostrava third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 1998* Ostrava ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #18 3-6 6-4 6-2 Paul Haarhuis #64 Match data
Feb 19, 1998* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #30 6-2 6-3 Paul Haarhuis #77 Match data
Jun 20, 1996* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Paul Haarhuis #24 2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
May 16, 1996* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Thomas Enqvist #9 6-4 7-6(4) Paul Haarhuis #31 Match data
Mar 14, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Paul Haarhuis #68 6-4 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Jan 18, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Thomas Enqvist #44 6-2 6-1 6-1 Paul Haarhuis #41 Match data
Apr 21, 1993* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Paul Haarhuis #66 7-5 6-1 Thomas Enqvist #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,885 250 245 50.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 — — — — — — —
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,668 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,728 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1992 32–28 53.3% #39 1,681 0 0
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,762 0 0
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,714 0 0
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,714 0 1
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 1996 30–27 52.6% #25 1,746 0 1
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,676 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,663 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1