H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Rainer Schuettler H2H: 2-2

Thomas Enqvist and Rainer Schuettler are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rainer Schuettler leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rainer Schuettler won the 2005 Stockholm Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Rainer Schuettler
GER Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rainer Schuettler #88 6-4 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #155 Match data Oct 13, 2005* R32 Stockholm Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #14 6-2 4-6 6-3 Rainer Schuettler #45 Match data Apr 18, 2001* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #20 6-2 6-4 7-5 Rainer Schuettler #48 Match data Jun 25, 1999* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Rainer Schuettler #229 6-6 (ret.) Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data Apr 10, 1997* R32 Chennai World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Rainer Schuettler #1,007 #5 3,205 1,987 315 326 49.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Rainer Schuettler
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #446 1,494 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1997 5–2 71.4% #117 1,567 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1998 12–15 44.4% #124 1,588 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1999 23–28 45.1% #48 1,610 0 1
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 2000 21–26 44.7% #45 1,702 0 1
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2001 33–31 51.6% #43 1,781 0 2
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2002 38–29 56.7% #33 1,715 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2003 70–27 72.2% #6 1,954 0 4
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2004 25–29 46.3% #42 1,707 0 4
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2005 17–24 41.5% #88 1,673 0 4
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2006 10–22 31.2% #97 1,543 0 4
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2007 7–13 35.0% #99 1,653 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2008 21–23 47.7% #33 1,750 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2009 15–26 36.6% #85 1,646 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2010 13–17 43.3% #84 1,657 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2011 5–13 27.8% #132 1,645 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Rainer Schuettler
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1997 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1998 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 15 13 28 53.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2001 25 16 41 61.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2002 27 18 45 60.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 44 15 59 74.6% 15 9 24 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 5 14 19 26.3% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 8 11 19 42.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 16 25 36.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 191 177 368 51.9% 58 89 147 39.5% 44 36 80 55.0% 22 24 46 47.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 585/641 of Rainer Schuettler's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Rainer Schuettler
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% 1995 1/1 2.0 5.0 67.6% 60.0% 45.8% 63.6% 22.2% 55.4% 36.1%
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1997 5/7 3.2 1.8 59.3% 63.4% 56.6% 24.9% 74.4% 60.9% 41.2%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1998 22/27 1.3 3.1 61.5% 67.2% 50.8% 53.4% 40.1% 60.5% 37.5%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1999 45/51 2.4 3.2 57.7% 65.5% 50.6% 56.1% 45.9% 59.1% 39.3%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 2000 37/47 3.7 3.2 56.4% 70.8% 51.9% 57.4% 41.7% 62.1% 38.1%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 2001 55/64 3.6 3.7 57.5% 68.9% 51.4% 54.5% 44.3% 61.3% 38.5%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 2002 53/67 3.7 3.3 57.2% 70.2% 53.3% 54.4% 51.7% 63.0% 41.8%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 2003 93/97 3.5 2.7 60.0% 71.1% 53.7% 56.1% 47.7% 64.2% 42.8%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2004 53/54 4.0 3.0 58.9% 70.0% 53.9% 56.4% 39.3% 63.5% 38.9%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2005 41/41 3.5 3.4 58.9% 66.5% 47.8% 53.6% 41.0% 58.7% 38.5%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2006 31/32 3.1 2.7 57.0% 68.2% 52.7% 48.7% 40.8% 61.6% 36.6%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2007 20/20 3.7 2.5 57.3% 67.5% 50.3% 52.7% 40.1% 59.9% 36.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 42/44 4.0 2.8 59.9% 69.3% 50.7% 56.4% 43.1% 61.9% 35.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 40/41 3.4 3.0 62.7% 65.5% 49.1% 54.2% 47.1% 59.3% 37.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 29/30 2.7 2.7 60.1% 70.5% 52.7% 50.9% 42.3% 63.3% 38.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 18/18 3.7 3.0 62.1% 66.8% 48.5% 67.0% 44.9% 59.7% 36.0%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 585/641 3.4 3.0 59.0% 68.8% 51.7% 54.8% 44.5% 61.7% 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Rainer Schuettler
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1995 1494 103.6 -0.83 +2.82 0.810 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1997 1567 110.8 -0.37 +1.44 1.052 51.0% +27 — — 64.3% +0.86 1–1 1–0 — +0.82
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1998 1588 122.0 -1.11 +0.05 0.950 48.9% +11 -33 +38 43.8% -0.41 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.68
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1999 1611 139.3 -2.17 +1.38 0.961 49.4% +29 +4 -40 43.0% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.92
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 2000 1702 141.9 -0.29 +0.58 1.005 50.3% +3 -88 -114 48.1% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.26
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 2001 1782 137.2 -0.89 +0.75 0.994 50.0% +30 -241 -174 52.3% +0.10 6–11 (35%) 12–14 (46%) — +0.71
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 2002 1715 143.9 +1.02 +3.65 1.131 52.4% +11 -116 -83 56.4% +0.58 12–11 (52%) 14–13 (52%) — -0.13
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2003 1955 155.2 +1.75 +5.40 1.197 53.2% +25 -223 -206 66.0% +1.00 15–9 (63%) 18–5 (78%) — +1.68
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2004 1708 138.0 +0.64 +2.30 1.063 51.1% -9 +66 +59 47.9% -0.06 9–16 (36%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.11
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2005 1674 126.5 -2.32 +0.58 0.932 48.8% +26 -24 +88 43.9% -0.53 4–8 (33%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.99
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2006 1544 124.6 -0.96 -0.49 0.953 49.0% +64 +44 +122 37.8% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.64
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2007 1654 131.7 -1.11 -0.45 0.897 48.3% +27 -96 — 38.5% -0.69 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1751 131.9 -0.77 -0.49 0.939 48.7% -49 -221 +83 47.1% -0.18 12–8 (60%) 5–15 (25%) — +0.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1646 128.9 -3.64 +0.63 0.911 48.4% -1 -170 +188 40.2% -0.60 6–10 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.89
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1658 132.1 -0.31 +1.67 1.047 50.8% -15 — +164 44.7% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.13
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1646 122.2 -2.38 -1.55 0.894 48.4% -37 -210 +200 38.3% -0.72 0–6 (0%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1648 107.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1987 142.7 -0.53 +1.67 1.017 50.4% +13 -94 +29 49.6% +0.04 90–108 (45%) 112–123 (48%) 95.5 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.