H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Rainer Schuettler H2H: 2-2
Thomas Enqvist and Rainer Schuettler are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rainer Schuettler leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rainer Schuettler won the 2005 Stockholm third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2005* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Rainer Schuettler | 6-4 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2001* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Thomas Enqvist | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Thomas Enqvist | 6-2 6-4 7-5 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1997* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Rainer Schuettler | 6-6 (ret.) | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Thomas Enqvist | Rainer Schuettler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 |
| 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 |
| 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 |
| 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 |
| 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |