H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 2-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 2–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1996 Australian Open fourth round 7-5 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #7 7-5 6-0 6-3 Renzo Furlan #38 Match data
Jul 9, 1992* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Enqvist #147 7-5 6-2 Renzo Furlan #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,844 209 231 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Renzo Furlan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1992 24–28 46.2% #53 1,667 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,681 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,682 0 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,727 0 2
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1996 29–26 52.7% #40 1,695 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,580 0 2
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,548 0 2