H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 3-4

Richard Krajicek holds a 4–3 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Monte Carlo Masters third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 20, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Krajicek #43 7-5 6-1 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Nov 1, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Thomas Enqvist #9 6-1 6-4 5-7 7-5 Richard Krajicek #12 Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Richard Krajicek #7 6-4 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #15 Match data
Feb 7, 1998* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #29 6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 Richard Krajicek #9 Match data
Mar 8, 1997* Rotterdam ATP 250 SF Carpet Richard Krajicek #7 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #8 Match data
Aug 10, 1996* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #12 7-6(7) 6-2 Richard Krajicek #8 Match data
Jan 7, 1993* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Krajicek #10 6-1 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17