H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Robin Soderling H2H: 1-3
Robin Soderling holds a 3–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2004 Stockholm third round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2004* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2004* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2004* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 7-6(4) 7-6(1) | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2001* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 7-5 6-3 | Robin Soderling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Robin Soderling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |