H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 3-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 3–0 lead over Stefan Edberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1996 Paris Masters quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 3, 1996* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Thomas Enqvist #12 6-4 7-6(6) Stefan Edberg #18 Match data
Feb 29, 1996* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #9 5-7 6-2 7-5 Stefan Edberg #31 Match data
Nov 11, 1995* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Thomas Enqvist #8 6-3 7-5 Stefan Edberg #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,233 744 246 75.2% 6 5 1 0 29 41

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Stefan Edberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,823 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,129 1 5
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,121 1 8
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,206 2 15
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1988 54–15 78.3% #5 2,080 3 18
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,149 3 20
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,172 4 27
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,146 5 33
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1992 64–19 77.1% #2 2,044 6 36
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,854 6 40
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,823 6 41
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,890 6 41
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 — — — — — — —