H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Stefan Koubek H2H: 1-1
Thomas Enqvist and Stefan Koubek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stefan Koubek leads 1–0 on clay, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-4 6-0 | Stefan Koubek | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1999* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Stefan Koubek | 6-3 2-6 5-5 (ret.) | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Stefan Koubek | #906 | #20 | 1,143 | 1,794 | 195 | 235 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Stefan Koubek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 2002 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #54 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #53 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 2004 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #60 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 2005 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 2006 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #80 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | 2007 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #47 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #135 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |