H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 5-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–3 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 13, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Enqvist #22 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 Thomas Johansson #9 Match data
Nov 1, 2001* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Thomas Johansson #18 6-3 7-6(7) Thomas Enqvist #27 Match data
Aug 25, 2001* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Thomas Johansson #14 7-5 3-6 7-6(7) Thomas Enqvist #19 Match data
Aug 13, 2001 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #19 6-2 5-7 6-1 Thomas Johansson #14 Match data
Nov 23, 2000* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Johansson #57 6-2 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Mar 16, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #10 6-1 6-4 Thomas Johansson #55 Match data
Aug 21, 1997* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #11 6-3 6-3 Thomas Johansson #33 Match data
Nov 9, 1996* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #8 6-3 3-6 6-3 Thomas Johansson #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 336 277 54.8% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1993 2–1 66.7% #422 1,535 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,492 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,699 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,899 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,725 0 3
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2000 22–25 46.8% #39 1,825 0 4
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,746 1 7
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,855 1 8
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,723 1 9
32 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,759 1 9
33 2008 11–17 39.3% #136 1,673 1 9