H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 5-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–3 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 Indian Wells Open round of 64 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #22 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 Thomas Johansson #9 Match data Mar 13, 2002* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Johansson #18 6-3 7-6(7) Thomas Enqvist #27 Match data Nov 1, 2001* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Thomas Johansson #14 7-5 3-6 7-6(7) Thomas Enqvist #19 Match data Aug 25, 2001* QF Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #19 6-2 5-7 6-1 Thomas Johansson #14 Match data Aug 17, 2001* R16 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Thomas Johansson #57 6-2 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data Nov 23, 2000* R32 Stockholm Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #10 6-1 6-4 Thomas Johansson #55 Match data Mar 16, 2000* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #11 6-3 6-3 Thomas Johansson #33 Match data Aug 21, 1997* R32 Long Island World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #8 6-3 3-6 6-3 Thomas Johansson #72 Match data Nov 9, 1996* SF Stockholm Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 — — — — — — —
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9
32 — — — — — — — 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9
33 — — — — — — — 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Thomas Johansson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 214/218 of Thomas Johansson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Thomas Johansson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2004 49/49 9.3 2.1 55.5% 77.2% 52.5% 62.8% 42.3% 66.2% 36.3%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2005 66/66 8.9 2.0 56.8% 77.3% 55.7% 59.6% 40.9% 68.0% 36.5%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2006 26/27 10.2 2.8 56.6% 75.4% 50.5% 61.8% 40.1% 64.6% 33.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 46/46 8.4 2.5 57.6% 74.9% 51.6% 60.3% 42.1% 65.1% 32.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 27/30 7.4 2.8 58.4% 72.2% 47.4% 60.8% 38.1% 61.8% 33.5%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 214/616 8.9 2.3 56.9% 75.9% 52.4% 60.9% 41.0% 65.8% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Thomas Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.21
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) — +2.54
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) — -1.44
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — +1.29
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) — -0.07
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) — -2.47
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.26
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) — -2.69
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) — +0.08
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.60
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) — -2.55
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.