H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Todd Martin H2H: 4-4

Thomas Enqvist and Todd Martin are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2001 Hamburg Masters second round 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2001* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Todd Martin #33 6-2 7-6(5) Thomas Enqvist #14 Match data
Nov 22, 1999 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Todd Martin #7 6-4 6-1 Thomas Enqvist #4 Match data
Nov 4, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #9 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Todd Martin #4 Match data
Oct 17, 1997* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #17 7-5 6-3 Todd Martin #58 Match data
Nov 10, 1996* Stockholm ATP 250 F Hard Thomas Enqvist #8 7-5 6-4 7-6(0) Todd Martin #12 Match data
Aug 12, 1996 Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Todd Martin #15 6-3 1-6 7-6(3) Thomas Enqvist #12 Match data
Feb 24, 1996* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Todd Martin #22 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #6 Match data
Oct 26, 1995* Essen Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #9 6-3 6-4 Todd Martin #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8