H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-3

Thomas Enqvist and Vincent Spadea are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2005 Memphis third round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H

3 – 3

6 main draw meetings

Vincent Spadea

USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Feb 17, 2005*	Memphis	ATP 250	R32	Hard	Vincent Spadea #21	7-5 6-2	Thomas Enqvist #71	Match data
Feb 19, 2004*	Memphis	ATP 250	R32	Hard	Thomas Enqvist #80	6-4 7-5	Vincent Spadea #28	Match data
Jan 21, 2004*	Australian Open	Grand Slam	R128	Hard	Thomas Enqvist #96	4-6 6-4 6-4 7-6(6)	Vincent Spadea #30	Match data
Aug 7, 1997*	Cincinnati Masters	Masters 1000	R32	Hard	Vincent Spadea #95	6-7(1) 6-3 6-3	Thomas Enqvist #7	Match data
Jul 25, 1997*	Los Angeles	ATP 250	R16	Hard	Thomas Enqvist #8	7-6(4) 6-1	Vincent Spadea #101	Match data
Mar 20, 1996*	Miami Masters	Masters 1000	R64	Hard	Vincent Spadea #90	6-3 7-5	Thomas Enqvist #9	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Thomas Enqvist	#548	#4	2,693	2,013	422	281	60.0%	0	3	0	0	16	19
Vincent Spadea	#1,474	#18	1,629	1,876	310	348	47.1%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Thomas Enqvist							Vincent Spadea
Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
1989	0–1	0.0%	#1103	1,484	0	0	1993	1–5	16.7%	#303	1,483	0	0
1990	0–1	0.0%	#472	1,480	0	0	1994	11–13	45.8%	#75	1,561	0	0
1991	1–5	16.7%	#231	1,467	0	0	1995	21–28	42.9%	#81	1,639	0	0
1992	16–9	64.0%	#63	1,734	0	1	1996	27–22	55.1%	#54	1,711	0	0
1993	18–23	43.9%	#88	1,712	0	2	1997	20–26	43.5%	#88	1,695	0	0
1994	23–19	54.8%	#59	1,761	0	2	1998	28–27	50.9%	#42	1,752	0	0
1995	63–22	74.1%	#7	1,982	0	7	1999	33–27	55.0%	#20	1,763	0	0
1996	49–25	66.2%	#9	1,980	0	10	2000	3–23	11.5%	#213	1,545	0	0
1997	35–21	62.5%	#28	1,873	0	11	2001	1–3	25.0%	#125	1,534	0	0
1998	35–15	70.0%	#22	1,869	0	13	2002	13–17	43.3%	#67	1,623	0	0
1999	45–25	64.3%	#4	1,913	0	16	2003	34–25	57.6%	#29	1,723	0	0
2000	51–23	68.9%	#9	1,906	0	18	2004	39–25	60.9%	#20	1,784	0	1
2001	31–21	59.6%	#24	1,848	0	18	2005	21–24	46.7%	#75	1,665	0	1
2002	23–17	57.5%	#44	1,792	0	19	2006	19–26	42.2%	#73	1,627	0	1
2003	13–23	36.1%	#96	1,710	0	19	2007	24–28	46.2%	#77	1,650	0	1
2004	12–19	38.7%	#72	1,627	0	19	2008	13–19	40.6%	#76	1,657	0	1
2005	7–12	36.8%	#133	1,589	0	19	2009	2–9	18.2%	#295	1,526	0	1
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2010	0–1	0.0%	#1517	1,480	0	1