H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Wayne Black H2H: 1-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 1–0 lead over Wayne Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 32 7-5 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Wayne Black
ZIM Age 52 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #13 7-5 6-4 6-2 Wayne Black #149 Match data Jul 1, 2001* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Wayne Black #1,469 #69 646 1,721 53 83 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Wayne Black
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1993 0–1 0.0% #719 1,494 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1994 2–2 50.0% #360 1,520 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1995 3–5 37.5% #194 1,520 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1996 3–5 37.5% #252 1,519 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1997 4–6 40.0% #99 1,559 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1998 17–24 41.5% #94 1,637 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1999 9–15 37.5% #151 1,564 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2000 8–9 47.1% #107 1,646 0 0
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2001 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 0
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2002 0–3 0.0% #417 1,562 0 0
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2003 2–4 33.3% #302 1,569 0 0
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 — — — — — — —
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Wayne Black
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 9 12 21 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2000 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 35 53 88 39.8% 3 10 13 23.1% 6 11 17 35.3% 9 9 18 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 109/135 of Wayne Black's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Wayne Black
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1994 4/4 2.8 1.5 70.2% 67.1% 51.2% 60.6% 48.0% 62.3% 43.1%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1995 6/8 1.7 3.0 58.0% 58.6% 45.4% 59.3% 57.7% 52.9% 37.8%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1996 5/8 1.8 4.4 49.7% 64.0% 48.1% 46.2% 38.3% 56.2% 33.4%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1997 7/10 2.4 3.1 61.6% 63.8% 51.3% 72.1% 47.9% 59.2% 39.2%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1998 32/41 3.0 2.3 59.6% 64.1% 48.8% 52.2% 44.9% 57.8% 38.9%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1999 20/24 2.7 2.4 59.1% 62.6% 49.8% 45.0% 47.5% 57.4% 40.4%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 2000 14/17 3.1 2.0 49.1% 65.0% 55.1% 59.5% 43.0% 60.3% 36.7%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 2001 14/14 3.0 2.6 52.0% 67.0% 52.4% 66.8% 41.9% 59.9% 37.5%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2002 2/3 2.5 3.0 54.0% 60.5% 47.0% 40.0% 34.4% 54.4% 36.4%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2003 5/6 0.8 2.4 55.6% 65.1% 53.1% 33.5% 44.6% 60.1% 33.7%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 109/136 2.7 2.5 56.9% 64.1% 50.5% 54.3% 45.2% 58.3% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Wayne Black
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1993 1494 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1994 1521 117.4 +0.75 +2.05 1.145 52.7% +24 — — 54.5% +0.45 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.04
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1995 1520 104.0 -4.08 +0.16 0.802 45.7% +12 — — 34.8% -1.22 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1996 1520 105.8 -2.98 -0.77 0.762 45.5% +21 — — 38.9% -0.89 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.58
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1997 1560 127.7 -1.25 +1.72 0.961 49.8% +47 -40 — 44.4% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.22
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1998 1638 129.8 -3.18 +0.95 0.922 48.2% +8 -158 +4 44.4% -0.48 7–10 (41%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.01
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1999 1564 128.4 -2.62 +0.76 0.947 48.8% +72 — +17 40.9% -0.45 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.36
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 2000 1647 125.5 -1.66 -0.94 0.925 48.7% +55 — — 50.0% -0.34 0–3 (0%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.31
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2001 1632 123.6 -0.93 -0.09 0.934 49.2% +40 — -69 37.5% -0.66 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.49
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2002 1562 104.5 -0.59 +1.18 0.798 45.7% +46 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.28
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2003 1569 113.3 +0.03 -0.36 0.845 46.5% +45 — — 25.0% -1.75 1–1 0–1 — -0.49
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1722 130.0 -2.17 +0.45 0.917 48.4% +37 -123 -17 41.7% -0.61 16–29 (36%) 24–22 (52%) 98.8 -0.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.