H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 1-5

Wayne Ferreira holds a 5–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2003 Montpellier Open round of 32 7-6(7) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #163 7-6(7) 7-6(3) Wayne Ferreira #26 Match data Oct 9, 2003* R32 Montpellier Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Wayne Ferreira #41 6-2 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #46 Match data Jan 9, 2003* R32 Sydney International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Wayne Ferreira #19 6-2 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data Nov 2, 2000* R32 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Wayne Ferreira #25 7-6(7) 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #13 Match data Feb 18, 1999* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Wayne Ferreira #10 7-5 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #14 Match data Aug 25, 1996* QF Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Wayne Ferreira #15 6-2 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #34 Match data Aug 20, 1994* QF Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,024 487 317 60.6% 0 2 0 1 12 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,528 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,713 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1992 49–25 66.2% #12 1,843 0 2
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,820 0 2
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,925 0 7
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,929 0 11
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1996 48–25 65.8% #10 1,841 0 13
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,815 0 13
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,824 0 13
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,705 0 13
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2000 41–22 65.1% #13 1,883 0 14
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,705 0 14
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,760 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,691 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Wayne Ferreira
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1992 25 11 36 69.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1993 24 11 35 68.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 8 12 33.3%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1994 41 10 51 80.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 8 7 15 53.3%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1995 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 17 5 22 77.3%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 31 12 43 72.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 16 10 26 61.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1998 17 14 31 54.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 15 14 29 51.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 30 12 42 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 7 11 18 38.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 15 11 26 57.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 17 12 29 58.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 283 168 451 62.7% 86 63 149 57.7% 65 32 97 67.0% 53 54 107 49.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 697/797 of Wayne Ferreira's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Wayne Ferreira
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% 1991 40/47 4.4 2.7 56.9% 70.6% 50.3% 49.1% 46.8% 62.1% 39.6%
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1992 63/74 6.7 3.0 55.1% 73.9% 50.7% 62.5% 44.0% 63.3% 39.6%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1993 54/63 6.6 2.8 56.2% 73.1% 49.7% 56.2% 44.8% 62.8% 39.0%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1994 83/91 7.3 2.4 56.3% 73.6% 52.6% 62.2% 46.1% 64.5% 40.6%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1995 73/80 6.7 2.7 56.0% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 42.0% 63.2% 40.6%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1996 62/73 7.6 2.9 55.2% 75.6% 49.1% 57.1% 42.2% 63.8% 38.6%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1997 41/48 6.4 3.3 52.4% 74.1% 50.1% 55.5% 44.1% 62.6% 38.7%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1998 49/57 6.2 3.2 53.7% 74.4% 49.8% 56.5% 37.8% 63.0% 37.1%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 1999 44/52 7.8 3.6 53.7% 76.2% 49.5% 56.4% 35.5% 64.0% 35.6%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2000 52/63 8.1 3.0 54.4% 75.4% 52.5% 60.7% 43.7% 65.0% 38.1%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2001 36/37 7.4 2.9 53.3% 73.7% 48.7% 50.4% 37.7% 61.9% 35.9%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2002 32/42 9.7 3.1 53.7% 75.5% 51.8% 59.0% 45.9% 64.5% 35.0%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2003 41/43 7.4 2.5 57.6% 73.3% 52.0% 64.5% 34.5% 64.1% 36.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 27/27 6.5 2.7 57.0% 69.6% 53.5% 55.7% 37.2% 62.8% 33.4%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 697/804 7.0 2.9 55.2% 74.0% 50.6% 58.1% 42.1% 63.5% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Wayne Ferreira
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1990 1529 106.7 — — — — +4 — +43 38.9% -0.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.74
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1991 1713 140.8 +1.01 +0.76 1.045 50.5% -8 -109 -124 55.6% +0.31 6–6 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.33
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1992 1844 150.1 +1.86 +1.37 1.079 51.4% -40 -90 -30 61.6% +0.56 13–9 (59%) 14–13 (52%) — +1.33
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1993 1820 147.3 +1.45 +1.28 1.048 50.7% -7 -110 +62 55.4% +0.25 13–5 (72%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.39
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1994 1926 153.9 +2.71 +3.14 1.146 52.6% +12 -174 +31 66.1% +0.98 25–11 (69%) 17–18 (49%) — -1.12
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1995 1929 153.8 +1.35 +2.81 1.104 51.9% +1 -10 -46 62.0% +0.71 20–9 (69%) 15–19 (44%) — +2.01
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1996 1841 151.0 +2.07 +1.61 1.069 51.2% -5 +101 +71 59.2% +0.49 18–8 (69%) 15–14 (52%) — +0.39
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1997 1815 140.4 +0.88 +0.38 1.034 50.5% +13 +52 +82 53.0% +0.26 12–8 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.69
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 1998 1824 152.8 +1.42 +0.81 1.003 49.7% -7 +48 +89 55.9% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 10–11 (48%) — -4.20
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 1999 1705 139.5 +1.33 -1.08 0.989 49.8% +25 +131 +113 50.7% -0.06 12–10 (55%) 14–12 (54%) — +0.17
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2000 1883 148.6 +2.46 +1.75 1.087 51.3% +7 -57 -24 58.0% +0.45 13–8 (62%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.27
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2001 1705 132.4 +0.45 -1.42 0.944 48.8% +43 +43 +100 48.4% -0.29 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2002 1811 141.0 +1.54 -1.23 0.985 50.2% -10 -94 +18 55.9% +0.37 11–6 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.70
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2003 1761 144.9 +1.68 +0.18 1.020 50.4% +10 +2 — 55.1% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1692 120.9 +0.36 -2.47 0.899 48.1% -21 — +102 46.5% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.57
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 2024 151.9 +1.61 +1.00 1.049 50.8% 0 -17 +31 57.2% +0.38 169–103 (62%) 169–167 (50%) 103.3 -0.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.