H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Younes El Aynaoui H2H: 3-2

Thomas Enqvist holds a 3–2 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2001 Scottsdale third round 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 2001* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #9 4-6 6-3 6-2 Younes El Aynaoui #49 Match data
Jan 5, 1996* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Younes El Aynaoui #110 3-6 6-3 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data
Oct 20, 1994* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #54 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 Younes El Aynaoui #96 Match data
Oct 7, 1993* Toulouse ATP 250 R32 Hard Younes El Aynaoui #76 7-6(3) 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #51 Match data
Sep 30, 1993* Basel ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #51 7-5 6-1 Younes El Aynaoui #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 243 219 52.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Younes El Aynaoui
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1992 2–1 66.7% #311 1,519 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,632 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,515 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,561 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,569 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,727 0 1
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,714 0 1
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,822 0 2
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,828 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2004 0–4 0.0% #644 1,739 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,597 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,610 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,617 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,688 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,679 0 5