H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Thomas Fabbiano vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 0-1
Rogerio Dutra Silva holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rogerio Dutra Silva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rogerio Dutra Silva won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Rogerio Dutra Silva | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,747 | 27 | 63 | 30.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,746 | 24 | 60 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Fabbiano | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #98 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |