H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomas Fabbiano vs Salvatore Caruso H2H: 0-1
Salvatore Caruso holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Salvatore Caruso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Salvatore Caruso won the 2019 St. Petersburg third round 2-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2019* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Salvatore Caruso | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Salvatore Caruso | #1,904 | #76 | 928 | 1,750 | 19 | 44 | 30.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Fabbiano | Salvatore Caruso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #158 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–19 | 20.8% | #157 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |