H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-4
Daniel Vacek holds a 4–1 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 2000 London third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2000* | London | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 6-2 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1999* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-1 5-7 6-2 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1999* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-1 6-2 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1998* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-3 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1996* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |