H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Thomas Johansson vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-0

Thomas Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2006 St. Petersburg round of 32 6-0 6-7(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Johansson #64 6-0 6-7(3) 6-3 Frank Dancevic #82 Match data Oct 26, 2006* R32 St. Petersburg ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Johansson Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0
33 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Johansson Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4% — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 214/218 of Thomas Johansson's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Johansson Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2004 49/49 9.3 2.1 55.5% 77.2% 52.5% 62.8% 42.3% 66.2% 36.3% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 2005 66/66 8.9 2.0 56.8% 77.3% 55.7% 59.6% 40.9% 68.0% 36.5% 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 2006 26/27 10.2 2.8 56.6% 75.4% 50.5% 61.8% 40.1% 64.6% 33.3% 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 2007 46/46 8.4 2.5 57.6% 74.9% 51.6% 60.3% 42.1% 65.1% 32.1% 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
33 2008 27/30 7.4 2.8 58.4% 72.2% 47.4% 60.8% 38.1% 61.8% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 214/616 8.9 2.3 56.9% 75.9% 52.4% 60.9% 41.0% 65.8% 34.7% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Johansson Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23
22 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) — +2.54 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87
23 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) — -1.44 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19
24 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — +1.29 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65
25 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) — -0.07 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) — -2.47 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72
27 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.26 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
29 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) — -2.69 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
30 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) — +0.08 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.60 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11
32 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) — -2.55 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.34 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.