H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-0
Thomas Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2006 St. Petersburg third round 6-0 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Thomas Johansson | 6-0 6-7(3) 6-3 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |