H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Juan Albert Viloca Puig H2H: 3-0

Thomas Muster holds a 3–0 lead over Juan Albert Viloca Puig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1996 Mexican Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Juan Albert Viloca Puig
ESP Age 53

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #2 6-4 6-4 Juan Albert Viloca Puig Match data Mar 7, 1996* R32 Mexican Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Muster #12 6-3 6-3 Juan Albert Viloca Puig Match data Aug 5, 1994* R16 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Muster #10 6-3 6-2 Juan Albert Viloca Puig Match data Jul 21, 1994* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Juan Albert Viloca Puig — — — 1,668 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Juan Albert Viloca Puig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 — — — — — — —
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 — — — — — — —
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 — — — — — — —
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 — — — — — — —
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 — — — — — — —
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 — — — — — — —
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 — — — — — — —
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 — — — — — — —
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 — — — — — — —
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 — — — — — — —
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 — — — — — — —
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Juan Albert Viloca Puig
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1993 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1997 1 8 9 11.1% 17 15 32 53.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 5 23 28 17.9% 41 52 93 44.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Juan Albert Viloca Puig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.8 -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) 105.9 -0.14 1992 1496 105.8 — — — — — +27 — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–2 — -0.04
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) 109.8 -1.96 1993 1504 102.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.16
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) 100.8 +0.55 1994 1567 125.9 — — — — — +42 — 43.5% -0.26 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 -0.30
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) 105.7 +0.89 1995 1473 107.0 — — — — — +51 — 11.8% -2.24 0–1 0–2 — -0.24
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 98.2 -0.44 1996 1526 123.1 — — — — — +51 — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.25
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) 102.9 +0.43 1997 1614 132.4 — — — — -168 +85 — 42.1% -0.41 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 -0.55
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) 99.6 +2.71 1998 1535 118.2 — — — — -117 +85 — 36.0% -0.97 4–8 (33%) 7–5 (58%) 98.8 +0.02
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) 95.8 +0.94 1999 1518 105.7 — — — — — +98 — 30.0% -1.20 1–1 0–1 — +0.09
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) 110.0 -0.55 2000 1539 112.7 — — — — -114 — — 41.7% -0.42 1–1 1–0 — -0.07
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) 105.9 +1.60 2001 1568 118.1 — — — — — +68 — 50.0% -0.12 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.31
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) 97.2 -0.07 2002 1566 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) 99.0 -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -1.42 2004 1534 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1669 128.1 — — — — -139 +70 — 38.5% -0.70 18–19 (49%) 21–25 (46%) 101.9 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.