H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 7-2

Thomas Muster holds a 7–2 lead over Marcelo Filippini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 6–2 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1998 Boston third round 6-0 6-2.

AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
URU Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 1998* Boston ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Muster #24 6-0 6-2 Marcelo Filippini #140 Match data
May 23, 1998* St. Poelten ATP 250 QF Clay Marcelo Filippini #80 6-3 6-4 Thomas Muster #22 Match data
May 13, 1998* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Thomas Muster #24 6-1 6-0 Marcelo Filippini #79 Match data
Apr 15, 1998* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Thomas Muster #27 6-3 2-6 6-2 Marcelo Filippini #51 Match data
Aug 10, 1995* San Marino ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #3 6-4 6-2 Marcelo Filippini #79 Match data
Jul 28, 1995* Amsterdam ATP 250 R16 Clay Marcelo Filippini #82 (w/o) Thomas Muster #3 Match data
Jun 17, 1994* St. Poelten ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #11 7-6(8) 6-1 Marcelo Filippini #73 Match data
Apr 25, 1990* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Thomas Muster #30 6-2 6-2 Marcelo Filippini #48 Match data
Sep 25, 1988* Bari ATP 250 F Clay Thomas Muster #16 2-6 6-1 7-5 Marcelo Filippini #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Marcelo Filippini #967 #30 971 1,799 217 229 48.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Marcelo Filippini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1987 3–4 42.9% #118 1,518 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1988 25–17 59.5% #53 1,670 0 1
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1989 27–18 60.0% #43 1,728 0 2
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1990 24–22 52.2% #49 1,685 0 2
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1991 9–21 30.0% #107 1,528 0 2
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1992 25–21 54.3% #60 1,614 0 2
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1993 17–26 39.5% #87 1,625 0 2
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1994 22–15 59.5% #60 1,693 0 3
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1995 15–20 42.9% #101 1,674 0 3
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1996 13–14 48.1% #81 1,659 0 3
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 1997 26–21 55.3% #44 1,697 0 5
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 1998 5–16 23.8% #135 1,592 0 5
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 1999 6–12 33.3% #106 1,586 0 5
32 2000 0–2 0.0% #775 1,560 0 5
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44