H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Stefano Pescosolido H2H: 5-1

Thomas Muster holds a 5–1 lead over Stefano Pescosolido in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 4–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1996 Munich third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Stefano Pescosolido
ITA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 2, 1996* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #2 6-1 6-1 Stefano Pescosolido #71 Match data
Aug 12, 1995* San Marino ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #3 6-4 6-2 Stefano Pescosolido #93 Match data
Jun 24, 1995* St. Poelten ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #4 6-0 3-6 6-4 Stefano Pescosolido #170 Match data
Oct 14, 1994* Tel Aviv ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Muster #15 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 Stefano Pescosolido #72 Match data
Oct 16, 1993* Tel Aviv ATP 250 SF Hard Stefano Pescosolido #103 7-6(3) 1-6 7-6(4) Thomas Muster #9 Match data
Jun 21, 1991* Genova ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #83 6-4 6-3 Stefano Pescosolido #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Stefano Pescosolido #1,500 #42 781 1,763 107 155 40.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Stefano Pescosolido
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #739 1,491 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1989 2–5 28.6% #225 1,482 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1990 4–11 26.7% #141 1,479 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1991 10–16 38.5% #65 1,537 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1992 21–26 44.7% #62 1,592 0 1
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1993 14–14 50.0% #59 1,734 0 2
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1994 17–25 40.5% #113 1,621 0 2
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1995 20–17 54.1% #68 1,702 0 2
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1996 13–24 35.1% #136 1,592 0 2
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1997 0–2 0.0% #228 1,568 0 2
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1998 3–6 33.3% #183 1,573 0 2
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1999 2–2 50.0% #193 1,588 0 2
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 — — — — — — —
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 — — — — — — —
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #130 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #233 1,467 0 2
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —