H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 1-0

Thomas Muster holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1986 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tim Wilkison
USA Age 66 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #73 6-3 6-4 6-3 Tim Wilkison #28 Match data May 28, 1986* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Tim Wilkison #1,167 #23 269 1,897 294 298 49.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Tim Wilkison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 1977 21–27 43.8% #93 1,567 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 1978 10–13 43.5% #54 1,659 0 1
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1979 26–26 50.0% #69 1,666 0 2
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1980 24–25 49.0% #95 1,685 0 2
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1981 23–24 48.9% #71 1,756 0 3
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1982 28–22 56.0% #61 1,715 0 4
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1983 14–20 41.2% #88 1,683 0 4
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1984 26–20 56.5% #39 1,767 0 5
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1985 36–28 56.2% #44 1,807 0 6
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1986 33–23 58.9% #29 1,772 0 6
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1987 23–20 53.5% #55 1,731 0 6
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1988 15–20 42.9% #121 1,673 0 6
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 1989 8–16 33.3% #124 1,601 0 6
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 1990 7–13 35.0% #210 1,542 0 6
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,524 0 6
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Tim Wilkison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1977 7 9 16 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 6 8 14 42.9%
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1980 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1982 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 15 8 23 65.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 23 11 34 67.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1986 14 11 25 56.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1987 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1988 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 143 126 269 53.2% 34 39 73 46.6% 73 61 134 54.5% 44 72 116 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Tim Wilkison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 1977 1567 122.3 — — — — -3 +28 -30 44.0% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +4.04
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 1978 1660 119.2 — — — — -158 — +58 42.4% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.15
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1979 1666 141.3 — — — — +26 -130 +55 50.4% +0.12 5–5 (50%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.77
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1980 1685 133.1 — — — — +47 -139 -15 46.2% -0.09 8–4 (67%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.50
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1981 1756 139.5 — — — — -103 — +46 50.4% -0.15 7–8 (47%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.41
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1982 1716 131.5 — — — — +37 -178 +17 52.5% +0.20 12–3 (80%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.66
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1983 1683 139.3 — — — — +39 — -5 42.2% -0.40 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.94
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1984 1767 141.4 — — — — -9 -95 -134 54.5% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 5–11 (31%) — +1.11
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1985 1807 144.0 — — — — -6 -169 -99 56.4% +0.46 9–13 (41%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.48
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1986 1773 145.5 — — — — +8 -113 -1 55.6% +0.64 10–5 (67%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.92
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1987 1731 138.2 — — — — 0 — +53 50.9% +0.10 12–7 (63%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.49
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 1988 1673 129.9 — — — — +18 — +13 44.2% -0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.05
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 1989 1602 130.6 — — — — -14 +67 +72 33.9% -0.84 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.68
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 1990 1542 110.3 — — — — -17 +146 +113 34.0% -0.92 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.59
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1525 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.17
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1897 141.4 — — — — -1 -64 +12 48.8% +0.03 94–75 (56%) 97–101 (49%) 104.5 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.