H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Andreas Haider-Maurer H2H: 1-0
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 1–0 lead over Andreas Haider-Maurer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2014 Sao Paulo fourth round 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2014* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andreas Haider-Maurer | #486 | #47 | 946 | 1,749 | 39 | 74 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Andreas Haider-Maurer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #119 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #112 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #63 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |