H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-0
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2013 Miami Masters first round 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |