H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Thomaz Bellucci vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0

Thomaz Bellucci holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2010 Costa Do Sauipe round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomaz Bellucci #278 6-1 7-6(7) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #212 Match data May 28, 2018 Q2 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Thomaz Bellucci #28 6-4 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #81 Match data Feb 12, 2010* R16 Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,932 182 204 47.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2008 3–12 20.0% #85 1,540 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,796 0 2 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,711 0 2 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2012 24–22 52.2% #33 1,819 0 3 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,678 0 3 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,794 0 3 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,854 0 4 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2016 17–22 43.6% #61 1,801 0 4 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,701 0 4 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,659 0 4 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,614 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,603 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2008 1 8 9 11.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 11 13 24 45.8% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2011 7 13 20 35.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2016 9 9 18 50.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2018 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 94 158 40.5% 112 98 210 53.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 375/386 of Thomaz Bellucci's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2008 14/15 6.2 3.5 56.6% 66.0% 50.1% 52.2% 38.9% 58.5% 33.6% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2009 35/35 6.7 2.6 61.2% 71.4% 51.4% 58.0% 37.9% 63.5% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 55/56 7.2 2.8 58.2% 71.4% 50.2% 56.7% 43.0% 62.5% 37.8% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2011 47/47 6.3 2.7 61.1% 71.6% 49.9% 57.9% 40.4% 63.2% 37.7% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2012 44/46 5.8 2.8 56.5% 70.7% 52.6% 57.2% 41.6% 62.7% 38.2% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2013 22/23 6.1 3.5 54.3% 68.1% 51.0% 54.2% 33.5% 60.6% 34.8% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2014 28/29 6.8 3.3 56.3% 73.0% 51.8% 60.0% 47.9% 63.8% 36.6% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2015 56/56 5.9 3.5 58.5% 72.0% 52.7% 60.2% 39.5% 63.9% 38.3% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2016 34/39 4.8 4.1 56.8% 68.9% 51.4% 53.6% 43.7% 61.3% 38.2% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2017 32/32 4.9 4.3 58.3% 67.2% 51.6% 49.6% 45.3% 60.8% 36.8% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2018 6/6 4.2 3.3 59.0% 68.8% 49.0% 57.0% 45.5% 60.7% 40.2% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2021 1/1 3.0 3.0 60.9% 59.5% 44.4% 33.3% 11.1% 53.6% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1/1 0.0 3.0 53.5% 55.3% 51.5% 62.5% 0.0% 53.5% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 375/386 6.1 3.2 58.1% 70.5% 51.3% 56.5% 41.2% 62.4% 37.1% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2007 1485 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2008 1541 122.5 -1.95 -2.46 0.810 46.6% -85 +113 — 34.1% -1.14 0–5 (0%) 4–1 (80%) 97.7 +0.12 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2009 1782 138.6 +0.15 -2.07 0.944 49.0% -61 -3 — 50.0% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.4 +0.66 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1797 150.7 -0.44 +1.56 1.007 50.0% -63 +117 -167 54.1% +0.16 13–10 (57%) 11–11 (50%) 105.5 +0.82 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2011 1711 145.3 +0.83 +0.14 1.023 50.1% -61 +227 -72 48.4% -0.07 11–11 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.9 +2.85 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2012 1819 150.8 +0.10 +1.17 1.023 50.4% -118 +145 — 51.3% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) 99.4 -0.64 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2013 1679 127.7 -1.87 -1.99 0.883 47.7% -32 +132 — 36.2% -0.97 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 98.1 +0.53 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2014 1794 144.9 +0.75 -0.17 1.011 50.2% -16 +20 — 49.3% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 101.6 -0.47 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2015 1855 155.7 +0.52 +2.08 1.061 50.9% -84 +107 — 50.4% +0.01 11–10 (52%) 16–13 (55%) 101.1 -0.93 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2016 1801 145.0 -1.11 +1.56 0.986 49.7% -29 +10 -201 44.1% -0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 97.2 -0.79 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2017 1702 134.5 -3.07 +0.19 0.937 48.6% -1 +51 — 39.8% -0.67 5–8 (38%) 8–12 (40%) 94.4 -0.46 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2018 1660 117.8 -0.83 -0.48 1.024 50.4% — +58 — 38.9% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.14 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2019 1628 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2021 1614 102.4 -1.27 +1.41 0.740 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1603 103.9 +1.78 -2.27 0.538 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 149.6 -0.36 +0.43 0.987 49.7% -63 +93 -139 47.2% -0.22 70–83 (46%) 89–86 (51%) 100.1 +0.42 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.