H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Frederik Nielsen H2H: 2-0
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 2–0 lead over Frederik Nielsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2011 Estoril third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2011* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-5 6-1 | Frederik Nielsen | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2009* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Frederik Nielsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Frederik Nielsen | #1,346 | #190 | 294 | 1,665 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Frederik Nielsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |