H2H data updated: 2026-10-21 00:00 UTC

Thomaz Bellucci vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 1-0

Thomaz Bellucci holds a 1–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2015 Madrid Open first round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomaz Bellucci #77 6-4 7-5 Jeremy Chardy #32 Match data May 5, 2015* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,932 182 204 47.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2008 3–12 20.0% #85 1,540 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,796 0 2 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,711 0 2 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2012 24–22 52.2% #33 1,819 0 3 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,678 0 3 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,794 0 3 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,854 0 4 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2016 17–22 43.6% #61 1,801 0 4 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,701 0 4 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,659 0 4 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,614 0 4 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
35 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,603 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2008 1 8 9 11.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2010 11 13 24 45.8% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2011 7 13 20 35.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2016 9 9 18 50.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2018 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 64 94 158 40.5% 112 98 210 53.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 375/386 of Thomaz Bellucci's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2008 14/15 6.2 3.5 56.6% 66.0% 50.1% 52.2% 38.9% 58.5% 33.6% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2009 35/35 6.7 2.6 61.2% 71.4% 51.4% 58.0% 37.9% 63.5% 34.5% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2010 55/56 7.2 2.8 58.2% 71.4% 50.2% 56.7% 43.0% 62.5% 37.8% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2011 47/47 6.3 2.7 61.1% 71.6% 49.9% 57.9% 40.4% 63.2% 37.7% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2012 44/46 5.8 2.8 56.5% 70.7% 52.6% 57.2% 41.6% 62.7% 38.2% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2013 22/23 6.1 3.5 54.3% 68.1% 51.0% 54.2% 33.5% 60.6% 34.8% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2014 28/29 6.8 3.3 56.3% 73.0% 51.8% 60.0% 47.9% 63.8% 36.6% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2015 56/56 5.9 3.5 58.5% 72.0% 52.7% 60.2% 39.5% 63.9% 38.3% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2016 34/39 4.8 4.1 56.8% 68.9% 51.4% 53.6% 43.7% 61.3% 38.2% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2017 32/32 4.9 4.3 58.3% 67.2% 51.6% 49.6% 45.3% 60.8% 36.8% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2018 6/6 4.2 3.3 59.0% 68.8% 49.0% 57.0% 45.5% 60.7% 40.2% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 2021 1/1 3.0 3.0 60.9% 59.5% 44.4% 33.3% 11.1% 53.6% 34.3% 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
35 2023 1/1 0.0 3.0 53.5% 55.3% 51.5% 62.5% 0.0% 53.5% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 375/386 6.1 3.2 58.1% 70.5% 51.3% 56.5% 41.2% 62.4% 37.1% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1485 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2008 1541 122.5 -1.95 -2.46 0.810 46.6% -85 +113 — 34.1% -1.14 0–5 (0%) 4–1 (80%) 97.7 +0.12 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2009 1782 138.6 +0.15 -2.07 0.944 49.0% -61 -3 — 50.0% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.4 +0.66 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2010 1797 150.7 -0.44 +1.56 1.007 50.0% -63 +117 -167 54.1% +0.16 13–10 (57%) 11–11 (50%) 105.5 +0.82 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2011 1711 145.3 +0.83 +0.14 1.023 50.1% -61 +227 -72 48.4% -0.07 11–11 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.9 +2.85 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2012 1819 150.8 +0.10 +1.17 1.023 50.4% -118 +145 — 51.3% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) 99.4 -0.64 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2013 1679 127.7 -1.87 -1.99 0.883 47.7% -32 +132 — 36.2% -0.97 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 98.1 +0.53 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2014 1794 144.9 +0.75 -0.17 1.011 50.2% -16 +20 — 49.3% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 101.6 -0.47 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2015 1855 155.7 +0.52 +2.08 1.061 50.9% -84 +107 — 50.4% +0.01 11–10 (52%) 16–13 (55%) 101.1 -0.93 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2016 1801 145.0 -1.11 +1.56 0.986 49.7% -29 +10 -201 44.1% -0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 97.2 -0.79 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2017 1702 134.5 -3.07 +0.19 0.937 48.6% -1 +51 — 39.8% -0.67 5–8 (38%) 8–12 (40%) 94.4 -0.46 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 2018 1660 117.8 -0.83 -0.48 1.024 50.4% — +58 — 38.9% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.14 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 2019 1628 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 2021 1614 102.4 -1.27 +1.41 0.740 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
35 2023 1603 103.9 +1.78 -2.27 0.538 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 1933 149.6 -0.36 +0.43 0.987 49.7% -63 +93 -139 47.2% -0.22 70–83 (46%) 89–86 (51%) 100.1 +0.42 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.