H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Thomaz Bellucci vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 1-0

Thomaz Bellucci holds a 1–0 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2012 Indian Wells Open second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomaz Bellucci #50 6-3 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #20 Match data Mar 11, 2012* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,932 182 204 47.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,017 331 307 51.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2008 3–12 20.0% #85 1,540 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,660 0 0
22 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,796 0 2 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,583 0 0
23 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,711 0 2 2004 27–23 54.0% #39 1,759 0 0
24 2012 24–22 52.2% #33 1,819 0 3 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,678 0 3 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,774 0 1
26 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,794 0 3 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,696 0 1
27 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,854 0 4 2008 29–24 54.7% #34 1,800 0 1
28 2016 17–22 43.6% #61 1,801 0 4 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,927 0 2
29 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,701 0 4 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,985 0 3
30 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,659 0 4 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,797 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2012 18–23 43.9% #29 1,755 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,826 0 5
33 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,614 0 4 2014 14–20 41.2% #113 1,757 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,603 0 4 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,769 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,708 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Jurgen Melzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2008 1 8 9 11.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 11 13 24 45.8% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 2011 7 13 20 35.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 14 24 41.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — 2006 9 11 20 45.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 17 15 32 53.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2016 9 9 18 50.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 19 15 34 55.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2018 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 19 13 32 59.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 94 158 40.5% 112 98 210 53.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — — — 168 168 336 50.0% 120 101 221 54.3% 38 33 71 53.5% 5 5 10 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 375/386 of Thomaz Bellucci's and 625/638 of Jurgen Melzer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Jurgen Melzer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/2 5.0 8.5 40.6% 59.2% 42.2% 56.1% 65.6% 49.1% 37.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 3/3 6.3 3.0 55.6% 64.6% 51.8% 38.5% 30.3% 59.7% 34.1%
20 2008 14/15 6.2 3.5 56.6% 66.0% 50.1% 52.2% 38.9% 58.5% 33.6% 2001 1/2 5.0 3.0 59.4% 75.4% 41.0% 60.0% 18.2% 61.5% 38.6%
21 2009 35/35 6.7 2.6 61.2% 71.4% 51.4% 58.0% 37.9% 63.5% 34.5% 2002 18/19 4.9 3.1 58.9% 72.7% 48.0% 53.1% 40.9% 62.5% 36.7%
22 2010 55/56 7.2 2.8 58.2% 71.4% 50.2% 56.7% 43.0% 62.5% 37.8% 2003 29/29 6.7 4.7 56.8% 67.4% 44.1% 58.3% 41.9% 57.1% 34.6%
23 2011 47/47 6.3 2.7 61.1% 71.6% 49.9% 57.9% 40.4% 63.2% 37.7% 2004 49/50 5.2 3.3 58.1% 72.6% 49.1% 63.9% 46.6% 62.8% 38.1%
24 2012 44/46 5.8 2.8 56.5% 70.7% 52.6% 57.2% 41.6% 62.7% 38.2% 2005 49/49 4.4 2.7 59.8% 68.4% 49.9% 58.8% 50.0% 60.8% 36.7%
25 2013 22/23 6.1 3.5 54.3% 68.1% 51.0% 54.2% 33.5% 60.6% 34.8% 2006 57/58 5.7 3.2 60.9% 69.3% 52.3% 62.2% 44.8% 62.5% 39.3%
26 2014 28/29 6.8 3.3 56.3% 73.0% 51.8% 60.0% 47.9% 63.8% 36.6% 2007 44/45 4.7 2.8 63.0% 67.4% 49.9% 58.3% 45.1% 61.2% 36.4%
27 2015 56/56 5.9 3.5 58.5% 72.0% 52.7% 60.2% 39.5% 63.9% 38.3% 2008 49/53 6.6 2.5 61.7% 71.5% 54.4% 57.6% 37.8% 65.0% 35.3%
28 2016 34/39 4.8 4.1 56.8% 68.9% 51.4% 53.6% 43.7% 61.3% 38.2% 2009 61/61 6.8 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.3% 58.8% 41.0% 64.9% 37.0%
29 2017 32/32 4.9 4.3 58.3% 67.2% 51.6% 49.6% 45.3% 60.8% 36.8% 2010 72/74 6.3 2.4 61.1% 72.2% 54.7% 59.9% 45.7% 65.3% 37.3%
30 2018 6/6 4.2 3.3 59.0% 68.8% 49.0% 57.0% 45.5% 60.7% 40.2% 2011 41/41 5.0 2.4 62.8% 68.9% 50.9% 51.6% 40.0% 62.1% 38.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 40/41 5.0 3.3 61.9% 69.0% 52.4% 52.4% 48.1% 62.4% 34.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 48/48 4.5 2.8 65.4% 67.2% 49.9% 56.8% 33.7% 61.1% 35.8%
33 2021 1/1 3.0 3.0 60.9% 59.5% 44.4% 33.3% 11.1% 53.6% 34.3% 2014 34/34 4.1 2.6 65.4% 67.2% 50.5% 54.5% 36.3% 61.2% 37.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 20/20 3.3 4.0 61.0% 67.3% 49.3% 60.5% 41.5% 60.4% 36.2%
35 2023 1/1 0.0 3.0 53.5% 55.3% 51.5% 62.5% 0.0% 53.5% 25.0% 2016 6/6 2.7 2.5 67.4% 66.9% 44.8% 60.6% 51.9% 59.3% 40.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 4.0 1.0 74.8% 56.6% 53.6% 22.2% 75.0% 55.9% 31.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/2 3.0 2.0 79.3% 72.5% 55.6% 100.0% 25.0% 69.0% 27.6%
Career — 375/386 6.1 3.2 58.1% 70.5% 51.3% 56.5% 41.2% 62.4% 37.1% — 625/638 5.4 2.9 61.2% 69.8% 51.0% 58.0% 42.8% 62.4% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Jurgen Melzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1518 108.7 -0.28 +0.62 0.727 43.2% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.03
19 2007 1485 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1548 113.7 -1.47 -0.74 0.846 47.2% — — — 22.2% -1.22 0–1 0–2 — -0.26
20 2008 1541 122.5 -1.95 -2.46 0.810 46.6% -85 +113 — 34.1% -1.14 0–5 (0%) 4–1 (80%) 97.7 +0.12 2001 1551 105.3 +1.50 -1.19 1.001 49.0% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04
21 2009 1782 138.6 +0.15 -2.07 0.944 49.0% -61 -3 — 50.0% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.4 +0.66 2002 1660 130.8 +0.42 -0.51 0.980 49.6% -48 -49 — 50.0% -0.07 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.12
22 2010 1797 150.7 -0.44 +1.56 1.007 50.0% -63 +117 -167 54.1% +0.16 13–10 (57%) 11–11 (50%) 105.5 +0.82 2003 1583 111.1 -3.51 -2.06 0.807 46.5% -20 -56 +87 39.0% -0.66 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) 104.3 +0.49
23 2011 1711 145.3 +0.83 +0.14 1.023 50.1% -61 +227 -72 48.4% -0.07 11–11 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.9 +2.85 2004 1760 142.0 +0.13 +1.60 1.023 50.6% -26 -102 -105 52.7% +0.22 8–8 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 100.0 -0.06
24 2012 1819 150.8 +0.10 +1.17 1.023 50.4% -118 +145 — 51.3% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) 99.4 -0.64 2005 1702 137.8 -0.93 +0.15 0.938 49.4% -35 +36 -24 50.0% -0.11 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) 96.3 -0.88
25 2013 1679 127.7 -1.87 -1.99 0.883 47.7% -32 +132 — 36.2% -0.97 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 98.1 +0.53 2006 1774 133.3 +0.02 +1.44 1.047 51.0% -104 +59 -110 52.9% +0.07 11–13 (46%) 13–9 (59%) 100.1 -0.50
26 2014 1794 144.9 +0.75 -0.17 1.011 50.2% -16 +20 — 49.3% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 101.6 -0.47 2007 1696 137.3 -1.21 +0.32 0.940 48.9% -11 +74 — 48.1% -0.22 9–7 (56%) 7–11 (39%) 95.6 +0.10
27 2015 1855 155.7 +0.52 +2.08 1.061 50.9% -84 +107 — 50.4% +0.01 11–10 (52%) 16–13 (55%) 101.1 -0.93 2008 1800 138.7 +1.21 -0.83 1.009 50.0% -22 -35 -116 52.4% +0.11 13–8 (62%) 13–15 (46%) 104.7 +0.86
28 2016 1801 145.0 -1.11 +1.56 0.986 49.7% -29 +10 -201 44.1% -0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 97.2 -0.79 2009 1927 151.7 +1.63 +0.96 1.054 50.8% -29 -86 -117 55.1% +0.14 8–8 (50%) 14–8 (64%) 105.0 -1.10
29 2017 1702 134.5 -3.07 +0.19 0.937 48.6% -1 +51 — 39.8% -0.67 5–8 (38%) 8–12 (40%) 94.4 -0.46 2010 1986 158.2 +2.39 +1.03 1.076 51.1% -20 -6 -97 59.0% +0.57 15–7 (68%) 19–21 (48%) 104.8 +1.32
30 2018 1660 117.8 -0.83 -0.48 1.024 50.4% — +58 — 38.9% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.14 2011 1797 152.8 -0.17 +0.99 1.011 50.3% +17 +143 +139 52.0% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 95.7 +1.81
31 2019 1628 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1755 145.9 -0.78 -0.89 0.925 48.7% +20 +103 +111 44.8% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 13–7 (65%) 102.7 +1.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1827 141.2 -1.23 -0.76 0.919 48.3% +22 -130 +72 47.5% -0.28 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) 101.5 +2.36
33 2021 1614 102.4 -1.27 +1.41 0.740 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 2014 1757 141.1 -1.73 +1.12 0.955 49.1% +3 -5 +127 41.2% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) 98.0 -1.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1750 127.3 -2.36 -0.42 0.914 48.8% +47 -54 — 44.7% -0.40 1–1 5–8 (38%) — -0.22
35 2023 1603 103.9 +1.78 -2.27 0.538 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03 2016 1770 130.7 -0.27 +1.24 0.995 50.5% +16 -37 — 60.0% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.56
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 123.5 +3.00 +7.41 0.704 43.9% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.44
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1708 119.9 -1.35 +6.34 0.890 49.7% — — — 100.0% +1.50 — 1–0 — -0.15
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1689 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 149.6 -0.36 +0.43 0.987 49.7% -63 +93 -139 47.2% -0.22 70–83 (46%) 89–86 (51%) 100.1 +0.42 — 2017 147.6 -0.10 +0.36 0.981 49.7% -14 -4 -12 50.4% -0.03 116–99 (54%) 134–143 (48%) 100.2 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.