H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Ricardo Mello H2H: 3-1
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 3–1 lead over Ricardo Mello in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2012 Sao Paulo fourth round 6-0 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 45
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2012* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 6-0 1-6 6-3 | Ricardo Mello | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-5 7-5 4-6 3-6 6-3 | Ricardo Mello | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Thomaz Bellucci | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Ricardo Mello | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2010* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ricardo Mello | 6-3 7-6(3) | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ricardo Mello | #1,018 | #50 | 738 | 1,773 | 52 | 87 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Ricardo Mello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #133 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #71 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #134 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #257 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1018 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |