H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Haroon Rahim H2H: 2-1
Thomaz Koch holds a 2–1 lead over Haroon Rahim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomaz Koch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Haroon Rahim leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Haroon Rahim won the 1975 Cincinnati third round 6-7 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PAK
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1975* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Haroon Rahim | 6-7 6-3 7-6 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1971* | Omaha | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Thomaz Koch | 6-3 6-3 | Haroon Rahim | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1970* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Thomaz Koch | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Haroon Rahim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Haroon Rahim | #130 | #34 | 0 | 1,855 | 148 | 176 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Haroon Rahim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 32–38 | 45.7% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 20–34 | 37.0% | #90 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |