H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ti Chen vs Rik De Voest

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Ti Chen vs Rik De Voest.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ti Chen
TPE Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Rik De Voest
RSA Age 46 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rik De Voest #129 6-2 5-7 6-4 Ti Chen #295 Match data Sep 26, 2011 Q2 Q Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ti Chen #1,433 #184 270 1,526 0 3 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rik De Voest #1,088 #110 538 1,692 19 38 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ti Chen Rik De Voest
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2005 0–1 0.0% #332 1,454 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #316 1,435 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0 2003 2–2 50.0% #241 1,468 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2004 3–2 60.0% #207 1,508 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2006 2–7 22.2% #135 1,451 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2007 3–4 42.9% #120 1,580 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2008 3–7 30.0% #159 1,651 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2009 1–5 16.7% #236 1,575 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2010 0–3 0.0% #181 1,630 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2011 5–4 55.6% #126 1,665 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 0–3 0.0% #258 1,604 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–1 0.0% #171 1,584 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ti Chen Rik De Voest
Yr HardGrass Yr HardGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — 16 30 46 34.8% 3 8 11 27.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ti Chen Rik De Voest
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2005 1/1 1.0 1.0 63.6% 54.3% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0% 52.7% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 61.2% 50.0% 31.6% 28.6% 0.0% 42.9% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1/1 1.0 1.0 72.2% 64.1% 40.0% 25.0% 0.0% 57.4% 28.3% 2003 4/4 1.3 1.5 62.9% 73.6% 51.7% 55.0% 23.6% 64.6% 33.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/5 5.8 3.0 55.9% 68.2% 55.4% 63.4% 44.7% 62.5% 35.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/9 3.6 2.1 58.0% 67.0% 48.0% 61.8% 30.9% 59.1% 32.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 7/7 3.6 1.7 60.9% 72.4% 46.1% 57.3% 31.4% 61.7% 38.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 10/10 4.1 2.3 57.6% 68.1% 50.8% 51.5% 52.8% 60.5% 33.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 2.8 2.2 58.1% 68.1% 47.5% 57.5% 35.2% 58.5% 31.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/3 7.3 2.3 65.9% 66.2% 47.8% 50.1% 38.7% 59.8% 34.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 9/9 4.1 1.2 61.1% 69.8% 47.8% 64.8% 37.8% 61.1% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 5.0 0.0 66.2% 65.9% 45.3% 53.3% 30.2% 59.3% 32.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/1 3.0 1.0 68.9% 56.9% 47.8% 63.6% 33.3% 54.1% 33.3%
Career — 3/3 1.3 1.3 65.7% 56.1% 40.5% 29.0% 33.3% 51.0% 30.1% — 57/57 4.0 1.9 60.0% 68.7% 48.9% 58.1% 37.5% 60.6% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ti Chen Rik De Voest
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2005 1455 95.8 -1.39 -0.30 0.731 43.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1436 92.0 -1.13 -2.15 0.481 36.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 2002 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1482 107.1 +2.38 +1.68 0.664 43.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.19 2003 1469 105.2 -0.66 +1.23 0.958 48.7% — — — 50.0% +0.13 — 0–1 — +0.08
24 2008 1465 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1509 105.1 -0.63 -0.05 0.950 49.7% +36 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 1–0 — +0.28
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 1450 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1451 112.9 -1.37 -2.43 0.791 46.3% +35 — — 30.0% -1.15 0–2 0–1 — +0.04
27 2011 1463 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1581 111.0 -1.61 +1.14 1.003 50.2% -3 — — 28.6% -1.43 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.13
28 2012 1439 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1651 120.0 -2.23 -1.52 0.834 47.1% +18 — — 30.4% -1.22 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.47
29 2013 1420 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1576 109.5 -3.14 -1.79 0.761 46.0% +30 — — 23.1% -1.23 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.41
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1630 119.7 -1.54 -0.67 0.860 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.92 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.05
31 2015 1389 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1665 118.2 -0.48 -1.65 0.907 49.0% -23 — — 47.6% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.95
32 2016 1365 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1605 111.1 -0.91 -1.40 0.802 46.5% +28 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–2 0–1 — +0.13
33 2017 1384 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1585 113.2 -2.33 -1.71 0.725 44.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1558 101.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1527 96.7 -0.05 -0.26 0.615 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.67 — 1692 117.2 -1.48 -1.02 0.865 47.8% +15 — — 35.1% -0.88 4–9 (31%) 8–14 (36%) 91.9 +4.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.