H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 2-1

Tim Henman holds a 2–1 lead over Adrian Voinea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Adrian Voinea leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Adrian Voinea won the 2002 Hamburg Open round of 32 7-6(5) 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Adrian Voinea
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Adrian Voinea #67 7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 Tim Henman #6 Match data May 16, 2002* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tim Henman #9 6-2 6-3 Adrian Voinea #103 Match data Aug 16, 2001* R32 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tim Henman #14 6-1 6-2 Adrian Voinea #56 Match data Feb 27, 1997* R32 Milan Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Adrian Voinea #1,046 #36 957 1,755 126 168 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Adrian Voinea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1994 2–4 33.3% #202 1,492 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1995 13–19 40.6% #56 1,567 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1996 28–25 52.8% #45 1,709 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1997 12–20 37.5% #139 1,629 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1998 11–9 55.0% #71 1,675 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1999 14–21 40.0% #100 1,650 0 1
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 2000 9–20 31.0% #110 1,552 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 2001 11–11 50.0% #97 1,625 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2002 18–20 47.4% #68 1,635 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2003 8–19 29.6% #154 1,531 0 1
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Adrian Voinea
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1998 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1999 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2003 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 47 61 108 43.5% 65 75 140 46.4% 5 14 19 26.3% 9 18 27 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 259/294 of Adrian Voinea's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Adrian Voinea
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% 1994 5/6 2.0 0.6 66.1% 60.2% 41.2% 41.5% 51.4% 53.7% 43.2%
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1995 28/32 5.8 3.0 59.0% 67.6% 51.2% 59.1% 44.9% 60.9% 37.4%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1996 46/53 5.2 2.9 58.6% 68.6% 50.9% 57.9% 40.5% 61.3% 36.8%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1997 30/32 5.9 3.4 56.9% 64.2% 45.8% 47.6% 40.5% 56.2% 38.0%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1998 16/20 4.8 2.4 56.2% 67.6% 53.3% 60.5% 52.9% 61.4% 36.2%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1999 31/35 5.5 3.1 53.9% 69.8% 49.1% 49.1% 46.5% 60.0% 37.7%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 2000 25/29 6.1 3.4 58.8% 69.5% 45.7% 51.9% 36.5% 59.7% 33.6%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 2001 20/22 4.6 3.1 53.8% 70.6% 49.8% 50.7% 42.8% 61.4% 38.4%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2002 32/38 6.2 4.2 54.9% 69.6% 50.0% 54.7% 34.0% 60.6% 36.5%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2003 26/27 5.6 3.8 56.6% 68.5% 46.9% 50.4% 49.2% 58.9% 33.1%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 259/294 5.5 3.2 56.9% 68.3% 49.0% 53.3% 42.5% 59.9% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Adrian Voinea
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1994 1493 101.4 -1.67 -1.23 0.933 48.4% — +28 — 33.3% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.43
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1995 1567 132.5 -0.38 -0.66 0.956 49.2% -80 +132 — 46.5% -0.26 3–8 (27%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.33
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1996 1710 138.7 -0.34 -0.30 0.952 49.5% -44 +61 -144 54.8% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.48
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1997 1629 126.5 -4.51 +0.39 0.866 47.2% +72 +45 -86 35.9% -0.96 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.87
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1998 1675 130.7 -0.22 -0.64 0.938 49.0% +39 +25 — 51.1% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.07
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1999 1651 125.5 -1.16 -0.03 0.943 48.8% -39 +66 — 43.6% -0.42 8–11 (42%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.55
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 2000 1553 120.2 -1.75 -2.79 0.834 46.7% +49 +58 — 34.3% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.04
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 2001 1625 126.7 -0.04 -0.19 0.995 49.0% -8 +38 — 43.5% -0.44 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.45
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 2002 1636 128.1 -1.48 -0.75 0.926 48.6% +17 +4 -151 47.2% -0.24 8–5 (62%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.15
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2003 1531 117.5 -3.51 -2.55 0.805 46.6% +84 +19 — 37.9% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.56
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 2007 1495 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1756 133.6 -1.52 -0.78 0.913 48.4% +4 +53 -131 44.5% -0.43 43–49 (47%) 63–54 (54%) 104.1 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.